Walsall Kipping v Coleshill B
Division Five Thu 25th Jan 2024 Verify
| Board | Home | Walsall Kipping | Coleshill B | Away | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (W) | 1612 (1592) | B Friend, David J | 1 - 0 | G Parnell, Phillip | 1332 (1347) |
| 2 (B) | 1560 (1582) | B Colwell, Steven R | 1 - 0(def) | B Payne, Rob | 1249 (1267) |
| 3 (W) | 1175 (1155) | B McCarthy, Alex | 0 - 1 | B Jones, Malcolm | 1235 (1230) |
| 4 (B) | 1454 (1438) | B Gavin, Peter | ½ - ½ | B Green, Des J | 1136 (1110) |
| Adjustment | -2½ - 2½ | ||||
| Total | 5801 | 0 - 4 | Total | 4952 |
Last update BDCLRecords Sat 27th Jan 2024 01:49. Reported by Des Green Thu 25th Jan 2024 22:46. Verified By Peter Nixon Fri 26th Jan 2024 17:56
Comments
dgreen
Thu, 25/01/2024 - 22:46
Permalink
Press / Admin Comment
Board violation by Walsall Kipping, board 4 more than 100 points higher than board 3.Coleshill claim the match 4 - 0
D Green
Coleshill Chess Club
pnixon
Fri, 26/01/2024 - 17:56
Permalink
Match 556
I know there is technical violation. Alex was the stand in Captain for the night. Our board 3 was running late and that the opponent was a blind player, Alex thought it easier if he swapped positions as he would have to describe the playing conditions for the late arriving player . Error on his part done in good faith.
If Coleshill want to win a game in that style, let them.
dgreen
Fri, 26/01/2024 - 19:51
Permalink
Match 556
I appreciate why Alex did what he did but the rules are there to be adhered to by all parties.
pnixon
Fri, 26/01/2024 - 20:21
Permalink
Why was board 2 defaulted
Why was board 2 defaulted then?
pnixon
Fri, 26/01/2024 - 20:22
Permalink
I could argue, you didn't
I could argue, you didn't have a player.
pnixon
Fri, 26/01/2024 - 20:28
Permalink
Malcolm Jones should have
Malcolm Jones should have played Steve Colwell.
pnixon
Fri, 26/01/2024 - 20:48
Permalink
I could argue every single
I could argue every single one of your players from that defaulted position is playing out of order. Rules are rules.
pnixon
Fri, 26/01/2024 - 21:09
Permalink
Your claiming the game
Your claiming the game because board 3 was played out of position of board 4 while you defaulted board 2? It's a bit rich, but if that is your style go ahead.
dgreen
Fri, 26/01/2024 - 22:15
Permalink
match 556
I am not prepared to get into a slanging match with you. I advised your board 2 player at 7:15 pm that I had not heard from our board 2 player and at that point turned my phone off as my game was about to start. At the end of the game I checked my phone and had received a message at 7:30 pm to say that he had suffered a puncture on the motorway and was awaiting a repair. I have no more comments to make.
alanw
Sat, 27/01/2024 - 02:00
Permalink
Board Order Violation
Board order.
Whilst I accept Walsall in good faith have done their best to field a full team at Short notice,
The 100Pt Board order rule takes no account of why, with Breach of the rule resulting in loss of Match
Sorry
Alan